I don't care at all about Qinsa, never had a char during his time, or how dangerous the player might be in a PK mud.
I liked Domond and Jermet.
The problem is more with the guy's play style not meshing well with having restrictions, which is why uncaballed evil suits him. See Jermet.
Domond booted an acolyte, and raided the Island in pursuit of another dwarf. That's just not acceptable under any rationalization for a Dwarf paladin Marshall. I watched him try, it wasn't good. Ultimately his response was the same as it was apparently during Qinsa. I'm right as a leader to interpret anything I want however I want, anyone else, including Imms, is wrong to say otherwise. From his view that may be the case, but in pretty much everyone else's he is wrong. He got caught once again engaging in this behavior with Qinsa., he paid the price. That's all there is to it.
Any time your sentence begins with What if, it's not really relevant. Qinsa isn't a what if, it's a what happened case.
And Quas's comment below is correct. The longer you play a character, the more boring/stagnant CF becomes, so you push boundaries to try and make things interesting, and while this can be fun, you have to accept the consequences of those actions.