I don't know man.

October 10, 2008 08:15PM
Let's play hypothetical.

You, Balrahd, have a sister. She is married. He's a cop. But he's also a drunk, he has a volatile temper, he threatens to kill his wife (or ex-wife, whatever), his kids, even his wife's dad (who would in turn be your father), tasers his own kid, and is a general mess in the crap he tries to pull off. I'd wager that you probably can't stand the guy, much less the fact that he represents the law as an officer.

Would you, as some type of DA or someone with some jurisdiction, not try pretty dang hard to get this guy fired? You have the ability to remove the sheriff of his office so you press and press him to get rid of your brother-in-law. But he won't (knowledge gap here because we don't know why, in the Palin story, Monegan won't do anything). So you fire the sheriff. You have that right at any time to do such, but you're only doing it to make a point. Yah, that's a pretty hard line to set but you feel it is worth it to eventually do the right thing. Keep in mind, you have that privilege explicitly set by the law, you can remove certain figureheads at any time.

What would you do? If I felt it was a legimate concern to deal with and was mishandled in the past because of a buddy-buddy system, I'd probably be infuriated and look to deal with it however I could.

I think that Palin obviously overextended herself in this but it's not near as big a deal as you want to make it out to be. No, I'm not scared of 'President Palin'. Proper channels? Sure, those exist and should be followed. I'm not going to apologize, I think she made a mistake. But please allow me to also say...big deal.




Finding Number One

For the reasons explained in section IV of this report, I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act. Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) provides

The legislature reaffirms that each public officer holds office as a public trust, and any effort to benefit a personal or financial interest through official action is a violation of that trust.

Finding Number Two

I find that, although Walt Monegan's refusal to fire Trooper Michael Wooten was not the sole reason he was fired by Governor Sarah Palin, it was likely a contributing factor to his termination as Commissioner of Public Safety. In spite of that, Governor Palin's firing of Commissioner Monegan was a proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads.
Subject Author Posted

Even you Republicans have to admit President Palin scares you. Alaskan legislative panel investigation finds Palin abused her power while Governor.

Balrahd(VIP) October 10, 2008 07:12PM

It's only fair

jegec October 13, 2008 10:10AM

I'm all in favor of having a heavy handed firing policy towards police officers.

Death_Claw October 12, 2008 10:08AM

I don't personally know the details, but..

Java October 12, 2008 10:38AM

Its not a court of law. I doubt they just made it up. n/t

Death_Claw October 14, 2008 01:22AM

Wow, Obama never abused his power!!

Doof October 11, 2008 01:41AM

I don't know man.

The Forsaken(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:15PM

I always destroy peoples careers because they won't break the rules to do what I want. ~

ORB October 11, 2008 05:03AM

It's what makes me a good christian. ~

ORB October 11, 2008 05:03AM

I thought that first paragraph was about McCain.

Yhorian(VIP) October 11, 2008 03:04AM

OK, admittedly, this, in a vacuum, wouldn't change my vote.

Balrahd(VIP) October 10, 2008 09:10PM

That, and I'm still not sure what she brings to the table.

The Forsaken(VIP) October 10, 2008 09:14PM

VPILF really... (n/t)

doge October 11, 2008 04:02PM

Cosign. NT

Batman October 13, 2008 04:12AM

Not as much as obama.

odrirg October 10, 2008 08:06PM

Cognitive dissonance FTW!!! (n/t)

doge October 11, 2008 04:01PM

It was 8 repubs and 4 democrats on the hearing committee. nt

The Forsaken(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:16PM

Yes...but read the article carefully....

odrirg October 10, 2008 08:32PM

It would've come out before October if the Palins had answered the subpeonas when they got them, instead of fighting it.

bell October 12, 2008 09:28AM

Shit, politics are dirty? n/t

Someone Not Special, Esquire October 11, 2008 10:14PM

I know, amazing, isn't it. I would have never thought....Oh wait. NT

Sam October 12, 2008 09:17AM

Sure, but that same committee voted 12-0 to make the findings public.

The Forsaken(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:40PM

and if they hadn't voted to release the documnets...

shane October 10, 2008 09:13PM

If that were the case at least two republicans would have voted no and it'd have been put public anyway. Apparently they didn't cover their ass. nt

Scrimbul October 12, 2008 03:10PM

I am posting a link and cut 'n paste the headline word for word. Get over it, Mr. "I Lie And Call It Hyperbole" :)

Balrahd(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:10PM

You know to what I am referring.

odrirg October 10, 2008 08:21PM

Um. Did you read those articles? n/t

Balrahd(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:25PM

Just ban him. Please. BAN HIM. NT

Scrimbul October 11, 2008 12:50PM

*giggle*

odrirg October 11, 2008 01:07PM

holy tinfoil hatfest, Batman!~

Blackbird October 12, 2008 08:40PM

Headlines, dude. You know they're meant to sensationalize. nt

The Forsaken(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:21PM

I know, but come on. Fox News has the exact same headline.

Balrahd(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:27PM

It's an AP article, they all use the same title. nt

The Forsaken(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:31PM

Odrirg is saying I misrepresented the story by cutting and pasting Fox News' and the AP's headline and the first paragraph.

Balrahd(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:37PM

*blink*

The Forsaken(VIP) October 10, 2008 08:48PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 140
Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 178 May 01, 2024