Put another way

November 07, 2011 12:58PM
My position is that people who can't learn from short bans and warnings deserve permabans.

Dur believes that they might still learn from short bans and warnings.

Happily, we're able to put this to the test and react accordingly.

The other thing is, I believe that if someone KNOWS that something will get a permaban, they're unlikely to do it and no ban will be necessary at all. Having said that, there's a difference between someone doing something stupid once and someone who makes a general habit of it.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/07/2011 01:00PM by daurwyn.
Subject Author Posted

Your rules suck, here are mie

Stevers October 27, 2011 08:01PM

You've shown that you can't adhere to these

daurwyn November 06, 2011 03:17AM

I can't adhere to these rules because they are not in place, nor followed correctly by anyone.

Stevers November 07, 2011 03:14PM

Is simply the mentioning of Nivek's name a sin, or is just the context in which it is provided-

Batman November 06, 2011 03:36AM

One more point

daurwyn November 07, 2011 01:04PM

Why does this make me want to delete my officials account.

Batman November 07, 2011 01:22PM

The context is as follows

daurwyn November 07, 2011 12:56PM

Wow.

superisisman November 08, 2011 04:22AM

We've exposed people for this before

daurwyn November 08, 2011 10:14AM

Not really my main point.

superisisman November 08, 2011 03:13PM

Under what capacity he made that claim is the issue. NT

Batman November 08, 2011 10:18AM

I think someone told him.

DurNominator November 08, 2011 11:27AM

Right, I'm only working from my understanding and my inability to read VIP threads. NT

Batman November 08, 2011 11:43AM

Here's a quote of the info he gave us.

DurNominator November 08, 2011 11:56AM

Separately

daurwyn November 10, 2011 09:06AM

Just check your own PMs for him.

Batman November 10, 2011 09:46AM

Yes, and I admit it was due to my misunderstanding. NT

Batman November 08, 2011 02:41PM

oh god i lolled so hard

Stevers November 07, 2011 03:08PM

It wasn't as a result of Stevers. It was me.

Batman November 07, 2011 01:26PM

This. Nivek chose to spread the information that he shouldn't have spread, and he got in trouble for it.

Stevers November 07, 2011 03:10PM

Not quite true.

The Forsaken November 08, 2011 10:04AM

No, that's not true. There is no way that VIPs had knowledge of who played Wiril.

Stevers November 08, 2011 10:44AM

I knew it was Jalim, Much like script kiddies you guys are so proud of the inane things you try to accomplish. (n/t)

NbM November 08, 2011 12:24PM

I fail to see the relevance to script kiddies.

RobDarken November 08, 2011 12:58PM

Haha, nice try, nerd anime-watcher. NT

Batman November 08, 2011 02:40PM

It wasn't Jalim, so you didn't know that. Don't be so foolish by claiming to know what isn't true. n/t

Stevers November 08, 2011 12:55PM

They "knew" it was Jalim.

DurNominator November 08, 2011 10:57AM

So, the VIPs were (incorrectly) speculating in private?

Stevers November 08, 2011 11:01AM

We were told afterwards.

DurNominator November 08, 2011 11:30AM

Okay, at least it wasn't while Wiril was active.

Stevers November 09, 2011 08:24AM

I would also add

daurwyn November 08, 2011 10:16AM

It is about same guy having to put up with a barrage of unwarranted insults.

DurNominator November 06, 2011 10:15PM

Put another way

daurwyn November 07, 2011 12:58PM

Whence cometh long bans?

Stevers November 07, 2011 03:02PM

If someone is intentionally trying to push the rules

daurwyn November 08, 2011 10:21AM

who, pray tell, has done this cracking and leaving? (n/t)

satchmo November 08, 2011 03:21PM

Pro, Oldril to name two

daurwyn November 10, 2011 09:00AM

Umm..pretty sure they both got banned for an extended amount of time first and VIP's highly contributed. So yeah....nice try. =) n/t

jalim November 16, 2011 03:56PM

Because, seriously, it's right there on enforcement that you banned Oldril 30 days just this week...I'm not buying it. (n/t)

satchmo November 16, 2011 04:24PM

That was after he came back (after a long absence)

daurwyn November 20, 2011 09:18PM

Me, for one! nt

Batman November 08, 2011 03:21PM

Stevers's point stands, though.

DurNominator November 08, 2011 11:46AM

Re: Stevers's point stands, though.

daurwyn November 10, 2011 09:17AM

That's an extreme case.

DurNominator November 10, 2011 10:28AM

Pssht, stop pretending we want to fix people. WE WANT TO CONDEMN AND ELIMINATE THEM! nt

Batman November 10, 2011 10:30AM

You can't beat trolls into submission. They regenerate too fast.

Matrik November 08, 2011 11:49AM

best post evar. (n/t)

satchmo November 08, 2011 02:47PM

If all of the "trolls" left and you gained 2 new "non troll" users, would it be worth it?

Stevers November 08, 2011 10:43AM

Yes, it would be worth it

daurwyn November 10, 2011 09:20AM

I don't contribute? n/t

Stevers November 10, 2011 12:27PM

>implying I don't contribute here

Batman November 10, 2011 09:48AM

Whoops! You forgot to switch to your Stevers alt :P

Jib November 10, 2011 09:51AM

Fuck! Hold on, let me switch to my Rob or Matrik account. NT

Batman November 10, 2011 10:16AM

What did the five fingers say to the face... ?

Jib November 10, 2011 09:25AM

It's never fun when people who are basically as smart as you refuse to play by your rules.

satchmo November 08, 2011 03:19PM

I imagine that's intended to be inflamatory

daurwyn November 10, 2011 09:26AM

>implying not constructive. nt

Batman November 10, 2011 09:45AM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 143
Record Number of Users: 1 April 26, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 161 April 28, 2024