Tribunal just needs another imm, preferably one known for being involved.

Jiijjustan

October 23, 2012 05:51PM

Registered: 15 years ago
Posts: 128

Having spent the entire summer playing one, I can tell you that the turnover is really bad in Tribunal. They just need more love than they currently get. How did Tryphen and Ziruanja make it a thousand hours in the cabal with no titles whatsoever? That goes for nearly all Tribunals. Little recognition for the boredom, whereas if you join any other cabal and show some proficiency you are almost guaranteed some love.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
What would it take to make Tribunal not suck?	laearrist	October 23, 2012 11:43AM
I have enjoyed every tribunal I have run, since they were arbiters (n/t)	Zheeser	October 26, 2012 11:22AM
WOULD SOMEONE PUT IN THE WORK AND MAKE A VINDICATOR ALREADY AND SHUT THESE FOOLS UP (n/t)	Frosty	October 25, 2012 09:12AM
heh I consistently put over 400 hours into Trib chars	wishore	October 25, 2012 11:08AM
Sorry Immteraction from Marcatis (n/t)	wishore	October 25, 2012 01:35PM
How much work do you anticipate?	laearrist	October 25, 2012 10:44AM
a more visibly involved imm, same as outlander	Quas	October 25, 2012 02:11AM
I've said it once, I'll say it again	HairyOrangutan	October 24, 2012 04:09AM
Most tribs would prefer stronger guildguards to hide behind rather than more conflict, imo. (n/t)	bell	October 24, 2012 03:16PM
tribs don't need anything power wise, they certainly have the upper hand in the trib/outlander conflict	Quas	October 25, 2012 04:42AM
I disagree.	Kez	October 25, 2012 11:30PM
Refresh is op (n/t)	Quas	October 26, 2012 02:01AM
It's not that useful when retreating	daurwyn(VIP)	October 26, 2012 03:11AM
And if you beat them up you don't need to retreat (n/t)	Quas	October 26, 2012 02:02AM
Indeed. I think insects is wildly OP and doesnt get enough press. (n/t)	Artificial	October 26, 2012 12:47AM
Except for provost/vindicator all the powers are purely defensive. Tribunal needs less defense and more offense.	semi_newbie	October 25, 2012 08:56AM
Not convinced	daurwyn(VIP)	October 25, 2012 10:37PM
nah. it's just not worth a fight where at any point the outlander can	The Forsaken(VIP)	October 24, 2012 05:37PM
Or sit one step outside the Spire and be safe, as someone previously mentioned. (n/t)	Kez	October 25, 2012 04:14AM
I brought that up to the imms - silliness to 'war' yet allow the enemy safety in your city. nt	The Forsaken(VIP)	October 25, 2012 04:57AM
the tribs are like cops	Quas	October 25, 2012 05:32AM
Re: wanted status	Quixotic	October 25, 2012 06:36AM
there is a lot of times where they aren't wanted.	tesline	October 25, 2012 05:55AM
How many outlanders have you played?	zoskia	October 25, 2012 07:13AM
I've seen it a lot	daurwyn(VIP)	October 26, 2012 03:06AM
I'm more of a serial tribunal player.	tesline	October 25, 2012 07:45AM
That likely has less to do with being wanted then sheer numbers	Quas	October 25, 2012 07:52AM
Autosneak makes life easier	daurwyn(VIP)	October 26, 2012 03:08AM
i'm talking about when trib has the fetish nt	The Forsaken(VIP)	October 25, 2012 05:35AM
If cops arrested "the boss" they wouldn't disallow gang members from the public space around the jail (n/t)	Quas	October 25, 2012 07:24AM
Give them a new power called 'Tribunal corden' where they can make an area of town really difficult to move into or out of when they have fetish etc (n/t)	abernyte	October 25, 2012 12:42PM
or at least a way to see through chameleon. nt	The Forsaken(VIP)	October 24, 2012 08:56AM
(WANTED) are always visible to Tribunals? (n/t)	Kez	October 24, 2012 04:44PM
No, they can only see hidden/invis while in town which does nto mean improved invis (n/t)	Zheeser	October 24, 2012 05:39PM
No I meant it as an idea.	Kez	October 24, 2012 06:06PM
The better pk ers shouldn't need it	daurwyn(VIP)	October 25, 2012 01:53AM
More warriors with maelstrom/one with shadows (n/t)	Baroness	October 24, 2012 03:58AM
Does One with Shadows trigger purely because the target is concealed or does it have to be ambush/blackjack and the like? (n/t)	Scrimbul	October 24, 2012 05:59AM
I recall a thing or two about it	Baroness	October 24, 2012 06:58AM
Wis based, negates attack, plus unblockable counter (n/t)	starbright	October 24, 2012 07:57AM
Making svirf or minotaur the best candidates for kicking ass with it? (n/t)	Baroness	October 24, 2012 09:35AM
Does it counter the ambush or you still get hit and just get a free attack? (n/t)	ORB	October 24, 2012 07:00AM
Just an idea. Would Outlander camo suffer...	Kez	October 24, 2012 02:57AM
Huh. Since you'd usually just have your gear located anyway... not a bad idea. (n/t)	The_Joker	October 24, 2012 08:33AM
I like this idea. And I enjoy Outlanders...	laearrist	October 24, 2012 04:18AM
It has some advantages to the outlander too	daurwyn(VIP)	October 26, 2012 03:16AM
Tribunal just needs another imm, preferably one known for being involved.	Jiijjustan	October 23, 2012 05:51PM
Some kind of rework would draw this type of involvement.	Scrimbul	October 23, 2012 06:27PM
If this happens, Maran will have to be beefed	starbright	October 24, 2012 08:04AM
totally! i refuse to play Maran because of Fortress. nt	The Forsaken(VIP)	October 24, 2012 09:01AM
I agree with you that it would be awesome to turn Maran into Scion-Good. That is why I suggested sticking Acolyte in Tribunal and giving it an orderly bent. (n/t)	Scrimbul	October 24, 2012 08:14AM
Moving acolytes to tribunal would be an immense nerf to maran, who are already one of the weakest cabal skillsets in the game.	vortexmagus	October 24, 2012 07:06AM
Don't forget that it's an insta-nerf to the Tribunal/Empire bandwagon and the Fortlander bandwagon. (n/t)	Scrimbul	October 24, 2012 08:15AM
A VERY good post. Not that I agree with everything. But it's very good! Post this on gameplay on officials! :) (n/t)	deriveh	October 23, 2012 08:50PM
Done. I very seriously doubt it will have any long term effect, and many of the points presented are opinion.	Scrimbul	October 23, 2012 11:59PM
My Take	NiceGuy	October 23, 2012 05:46PM
Main problem IMO is...	Kez	October 23, 2012 04:17PM
Tribunal and Outlander have the same problem when raiding against each other.	DurNominator(VIP)	October 23, 2012 08:03PM
Don't agree	daurwyn(VIP)	October 23, 2012 10:07PM
How many defenders were there when you took the scales?	DurNominator(VIP)	October 23, 2012 10:49PM
Re: How many defenders were there when you took the scales?	daurwyn(VIP)	October 25, 2012 01:56AM
Incorrect. Outlanders have an edge.	crafteddeception	October 23, 2012 08:33PM
Question about vulnerable to other factions	hopelessdwarf	October 23, 2012 08:55PM
Try playing an Evil outlander with no cabal powers	crafteddeception	October 24, 2012 06:12AM
Just do what every other Outlander does: log off. (n/t)	Kez	October 24, 2012 04:06PM
Sounds like easy street compared to duerg villager. (n/t)	alansmithee	October 24, 2012 07:02AM
Maybe. Ive never tried. But having the option to sit at the Big D	crafteddeception	October 24, 2012 07:24AM
Empire is also a defined enemy of Outlander (n/t)	DurNominator(VIP)	October 23, 2012 09:37PM
First of all, get rid of the freaking rangers already (n/t)	Zheeser	October 23, 2012 03:58PM
I posted ideas about this long ago	Mek	October 23, 2012 03:00PM
This biggest problem I see with this, though	Stevers	October 23, 2012 08:02PM
My method for that is included in all the details I don't want to bother with writing here. If an Imm is interested, they can contact me. -nt-	Mek	October 24, 2012 12:22PM
Re: I posted ideas about this long ago	qurdind	October 23, 2012 04:13PM
Yes. Raid. That's it exactly. I couldn't think of the word! -nt-	Mek	October 23, 2012 05:31PM
So we want to become a text version of WoW? (n/t)	BlkDrgn	October 24, 2012 06:34AM
Silence. -nt-	Mek	October 24, 2012 12:21PM
merchants would be affected nicely with a system like this (n/t)	Zheeser	October 23, 2012 04:00PM
I like this idea, but seems like a lot of work...	laearrist	October 23, 2012 03:19PM
Quit lurking and IMM again, please. (n/t)	Demtok	October 23, 2012 03:18PM
Get rid of Trib and put the Imperials in charge of the cities. (n/t)	igsoeh	October 23, 2012 02:38PM
That would be awesome. It could be a new age. (n/t)	The_Joker	October 24, 2012 09:02AM
Re: That would be awesome. It could be a new age.	Artificial	October 24, 2012 10:31AM
Create a two-tier system	hopelessdwarf	October 23, 2012 01:25PM
What we need is a 5 point plan	Demtok	October 23, 2012 02:10PM
9-9-9! (n/t)	satchmo	October 23, 2012 04:43PM
You forgot sticking it to the Sultan for falsifying his economic data from the seaport (n/t)	hopelessdwarf	October 23, 2012 03:34PM
Let Evils back in! (n/t)	Demtok	October 23, 2012 01:17PM
since when can evils not join? I had an evil tribunal a year ago... (n/t)	satchmo	October 23, 2012 01:44PM
Maybe you were the last one a year ago. (n/t)	Demtok	October 23, 2012 01:52PM
huh...it might have been 2 years. Anyway, that sucks. Law is law, alignment shouldn't matter.	satchmo	October 23, 2012 04:45PM
Evil can still be in Tribunal. Just harder to get in. (n/t)	Matrik	October 23, 2012 07:40PM
Re: What would it take to make Tribunal not suck?	ibuki	October 23, 2012 12:54PM
I agree with everything here. (n/t)	Artificial	October 23, 2012 01:05PM
I think its just the nature of tribunal or arbiter.	ghuljun_thul	October 23, 2012 12:27PM
man, I hated those guys. Shit, time to go kill tribunals. (n/t)	satchmo	October 23, 2012 01:45PM
Powers that worked outside of cities?	ORB	October 23, 2012 12:04PM
Already exists. (n/t)	Frosty	October 23, 2012 12:31PM
I mean for everyone not just 2-3 people in cabal (n/t)	ORB	October 23, 2012 06:06PM

Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 138

Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024

Record Number of Guests: 178 May 01, 2024

Moderators: Isildur, Gabe, The Forsaken