That's a good article, I enjoyed reading it. Do you have more such articles from similar perspectives?

January 24, 2017 12:20AM
I think the "usage of the fake proletariat" doesn't mean that the effects of sex, race, etc. are not real. They exist, but are secondary to more fundamental forces like wealth of parents, intelligence, and education of parents.

Focusing on the secondary issues of sex/race/etc. allows the ruling class to bypass the fundamental question of inequality. Indeed even inequality of "opportunity" is an awkward side-step which has gone unquestioned. Fundamentally it is inequality of outcome that is relevant. We accept inequality of outcome because it allows us to build a bigger, stronger capitalist whole.

Greed drives the total economy, because humans want to surpass each other. Harnessing this competitive drive is what led the Western world to greatness over other civilizations which also have bureaucracies, institutions, and educational systems. I know I love PKing fellow CFers and getting paid more than my peers not because I really need to but because I just like winning competitions. :-) Within bounds of decency of course.

So how do we allow some humans to win, but also allow the losers to live relatively comfortable lives, and at the same time continue to grow in economy and competitiveness? I think that's the bigger policy question that needs answering today, and most governments haven't even begun to acknowledge the facts necessary to embark on this mission.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/24/2017 12:38AM by starbright.
Subject Author Posted

Oil the flames

Kstatida January 23, 2017 10:52PM

Thanks for sharing.

Jib January 25, 2017 12:10PM

Well, I'll try to cut it in pieces

Kstatida January 26, 2017 01:12AM

This sounds about similar to CF cabal politics, lol. (n/t)

Murphy January 27, 2017 03:38PM

I don't think our point our views are that vastly different.

Jib January 26, 2017 09:55AM

I feel like your problem with globalism is a problem with capitalism in general

vortexmagus January 26, 2017 01:40PM

You are confusing true Capitalism with Corporatism.

Jib January 27, 2017 09:23AM

A truly free market always favors the rich and well-connected

vortexmagus January 27, 2017 09:25AM

Full stop. I'm saying globalism isn't capitalism. Period.

Jib January 27, 2017 11:47AM

Right, this is what I was saying, I was saying that you're blaming globalism for stuff that is inherent to all forms of capitalism.

vortexmagus January 28, 2017 11:18AM

He's blaming globalism for making that shit global (n/t)

Kstatida January 29, 2017 12:19AM

Dude, you know no shit, seriously

Kstatida January 27, 2017 09:42AM

No. No, they don't.

MiyagiYojimbo January 27, 2017 02:46PM

Geography isn't mandatory?

Murphy January 27, 2017 03:28PM

Want to know a secret?

MiyagiYojimbo January 27, 2017 06:10PM

Looks right to me. I wonder why all the blue islands have dragons. (n/t)

Matrik January 27, 2017 05:24PM

Haha. "Blue islands." #LAPR (n/t)

Murphy January 28, 2017 01:04AM

Think of it more like a poker game

Quas January 27, 2017 10:32AM

I'm confused at what point I mentioned a perfectly competitive market?

vortexmagus January 27, 2017 09:57AM

Exactly, so please don't use the term "free market"

Kstatida January 27, 2017 01:15PM

But what do we call your wife's vagina then? NT

Sam January 28, 2017 04:52PM

Think you meant dessert. (n/t)

Matrik January 28, 2017 05:14PM

Not when you give head. Dryer than a dessert. NT

Sam January 28, 2017 05:53PM

2/10 for effort.

Matrik January 28, 2017 06:21PM

C'mon, that's at least a 4/10 for the original subject line. NT

Sam January 28, 2017 06:38PM

No market is perfectly free and competitive, but functionally people advocate for deregulation of markets all the time. (n/t)

vortexmagus January 27, 2017 11:26PM

Please specify "people"

Kstatida January 28, 2017 12:57AM

Trump and Putin, to name two prominent ones. Their policies on oil and gas, in particular, are globalist and push deregulation. (n/t)

vortexmagus January 28, 2017 04:08PM

free market n/t

jalim January 27, 2017 01:39PM

This: but redistribution also tricky to implement without making it unfair for hardworking middle class or reducing incentives (n/t)

starbright January 26, 2017 10:01PM

Redistribution will ALWAYS reduce incentives.

vortexmagus January 27, 2017 08:20AM

Re: I don't think our point our views are that vastly different.

Kstatida January 26, 2017 12:20PM

It's a good article

Flipside Oreo January 24, 2017 04:29AM

That's a good article, I enjoyed reading it. Do you have more such articles from similar perspectives?

starbright January 24, 2017 12:20AM

I mean I agree with you on every count

vortexmagus January 24, 2017 04:55AM

I propose "Democratic Objective-Setting with Technocratic Execution" form of government

starbright January 24, 2017 05:53AM

Well that's a good question, but I can't think of any that are English-speaking.

Kstatida January 24, 2017 04:02AM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 130
Record Number of Users: 1 April 26, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 133 April 26, 2024