Re: That wasn't Reganomics. n/t

January 20, 2008 03:57PM
Quote
pro
Reganomics was spend spend spend.
The only way to do that was to untie the dollar from real assets and start borrowing into insanity from the federal reserve. That's pretty much what I meant by 'however much money we feel like'. Nixon started in 1971 by removing the final restrictions held on the federal reserve which required them to hold some gold in store to back the dollars they were creating.

Quote
pro
Build the Military then liquidate it when it wasn't needed at those levels.

The problem is that the debt accumulation by the US government inflates the dollar and decimates the savings of the lower and middle class. It affects the lower and middle class more because they get the dollar later in the cycle. The government and anyone closely tied to them (read: defense contractors and big bankers) gets to use the money first, when it's worth more. The goal inflation rate of the federal reserve 2-3% is an exponential decay of your savings perpetrated by the wealthiest people in the world.
Subject Author Posted

omg this blows

Lokain January 17, 2008 02:30PM

Yeah. My "work coach" and I went drinking afterwards. NT

Falstaff January 17, 2008 03:32PM

Wow, where the hells do you work? nt

enyuu January 17, 2008 03:01PM

I work for a city government

Lokain January 17, 2008 03:23PM

Same thing at my work

Rade January 17, 2008 07:50PM

ive heard its an incredible time to be a air traffic controller they are all retiring n/t

hopelessdwarf January 18, 2008 02:26PM

I think they're always looking for those guys

Lokain January 18, 2008 02:38PM

Now more than normal because Reagan fired all the ones on strike

ExPaladin(VIP) January 19, 2008 02:48AM

Do you know why ATC went on strike back then?

_Magus_ January 19, 2008 09:31PM

Behold, the power of Reaganomics nt

Rade January 19, 2008 04:03AM

It had to be done. That was nothing to do with Reganomics. n/t

Pro January 19, 2008 03:43PM

Eric, it was a joke...

Rade January 19, 2008 05:12PM

Yeah but you got it backwards...

Pro January 19, 2008 08:27PM

Hardly

Rade January 20, 2008 06:07AM

That wasn't Reganomics. n/t

Pro January 20, 2008 11:08AM

Re: That wasn't Reganomics. n/t

Rade January 20, 2008 03:57PM

Are you talking an annual cycle? n/t

Pro January 20, 2008 05:58PM

What? nt

Rade January 20, 2008 07:17PM

Or bad time to fly :( n/t.

Jib January 18, 2008 02:34PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 125
Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 178 May 01, 2024