Rather than produce arguments which support your assertion, you say something stupid and then demand people produce evidence to discredit you. Then, you try to poke holes in their argument. And you do it badly. Most people pass this stage of failed argumentative logic sometime in high school - perhaps you should go back to finish your education before you try to say something on the internet.

Quite frankly, if you think his evidence lacks credence, you need produce evidence to the contrary. Show that, indeed, Fox News wasn't completely full of shit when they said Obama's 3.6 trillion budget was 4x costlier than Bush's. Declaring that all his evidence is null and void because his sources are inferior, when you have yet to produce a single source of your own refuting his points, is just infantile, retarded, and completely illogical.

MD's argument isn't the strongest I've ever seen, but since you haven't contributed a single thing of worth to this discussion and produced absolutely 0 evidence backing up your assertions, anyone with a brain can see his ideas are vastly superior to yours.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/04/2010 06:32PM by vortex_magus.