And think you're pretty young.

But, for shits and giggles, the answer is that Kerry wasn't running on a platform that included cutting taxes for the wealthiest and cutting benefits for the poorest. Thus, I thought his actions would reduce the wealth gap that benefits him, rather than enlarge and enforce it when he already has plenty.

And while Romney has paid more than me or you in an absolute sense, he "kept" roughly 85% of his $20 million while we only "kept" roughly 65% of our $50k. The one with the most expendable budget is the one getting the best deal, which is what I was lamenting.

And if a $200-250 million net worth isn't hoarding money, what is?