But I'm still having difficulty comprehending the idea that there is a 66% chance of getting it right if you switch. This problem is essentially a choice between two doors, and each has an equal chance of having the item you want (each has 33% initially).
Given the fact that one door is shown to be empty, why would switching alter the fact that there are only two possible choices, and ea
Nian (and friends) walk into an eastern road full of his pk range without even flying or detect invisible, let alone enlarge/protection/stoneskin/shield/aura. Knowing that there are at least three imperials with a summoner around. Then you guys sit on the road, spending time sitting there deciding who to summon and asking each other about some random shifterguy's forms. The paladin didn'
IC justification or no. Seriously. The only people who make a big deal about it are the type who think that screwing other people over is the best way to look good.
You: "Help me kill this mob"
Douchey cabal member: "Omg, this mob is neutral, despite the fact that its insane, willing to attack you, and stuck in the middle of one of the biggest dens of evil in the game! You mu
If food choice is not a moral one, then people can't condemn you for eating babies, because its none of their goddamn business anyway, right? Babies have feelings, but who cares. They're delicious braised with garlic butter.
I know as a serial fortie player, whenever I see someone who has trouble getting into the Fort I want to take them by the head and smack them. After my second fort induction its become almost second nature to me. Send a note with some variation of "Hey, I'm an applicant, feel free to use me like a two-penny prostitute"
Find someone who is titled or obviously a member of the for
if they summon bard out, all bard has to do is repeatedly flee/lullaby them, since they have no way to lag him. Once he gets all three slept, he can sing them up, use curse preps, and fiend them once sanc is down. No way to guarantee the kill on any of them, but bard can definitely make them teleport or word out.
If they fight at inners, bard can force healer out of the game immediately with
The only reason to take sword is 1) the added damage from riposte and 2) the incredible damage potential of flurry. However, with crappy elf strength, daggers are just going to be better for everything. For damage, tanking, and malediction you're going to end up all relying on daggers. Flee/underhand will be more reliable damage than flurry and less dangerous, too. Parry for riposte is depen
much better than utility ones, imo.
only problem is to use them you gotta water primary for the first 30 levels.
It isn't as bad as it used to be, since a lot more first and second tier forms are amphibious, but you'll still be most effective in non-preferred ranking locations
Does using an angel reduce or increase the risk as opposed to eviler beings? Do you think the bash/rescuing/pillaring from angels is worth giving up the sweet powers that demons and devils can throw out? I guess it would all depend on the situation, but aren't angels more reluctant to help evil?
I guess my real question is: in what situation would you, an evil conjie, choose an angel or a
I'm not a big fan. If you want to write a decent paper on the immorality of this or that you end up spending half the paper defining your terms, since everyone has a slightly different definition of "immorality" and "vegetarianism" and "living things." Also, morality arguments which don't have anything to do with eating babies tend to be really vague.
I&
Last villager I died to was Marcus's Djabree, and I gave almost good as I got against him, though I ganged him pretty mercilessly in order to do it. (I consider this an achievement, since I am not anywhere near his pk level)
My problem does not stem from "omg I dunno how to flee quaff from melee players and then bring a gang to eat them with"
My problem stems from "I can
this only happens because as a rager, YOU don't need to spend hours gathering shinies and preps and groupmates. Rather, other people need to gather shinies and preps and groupmates to fight you, otherwise you'll destroy them with full ragesteel and average 20 weapons.
Douchey behavior depends on what you define as douchey. For example, I regard destroying magic items as roughly on th
As if a "bank" wasn't made up of hundreds (often thousands) of different people, with different (and often contradictory) interests.
I agree with Forsaken. I do not find it strange that what an individual bank needs to do to stay in business often contradicts what banks as a whole need to do to stay in business.
Its a very basic economic concept: what offers substantial benef
The worst part of a character, to me, is levelling in order to reach my highest potential.
I'd rather not spend so much time grinding when I could be RPing or exploring or gathering shinies or pking.
Double exp would make the game a lot more attractive to me. Repetitively killing mobs for hours at a time is probably my least favorite aspect of the game. The large time sink required to
The Government has always been the single biggest employer and banker in the country. This is true for almost every country in existence.
Did you only just realize that?
Be thankful. At least we're nowhere near close to China's government. Although technically they've privatized most industries to compete in the "free market", they've implemented republican-esq