Re: Logical Reasoning at Work (text)

Re: Logical Reasoning at Work (text):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Magtograme on December 7, 2000 at 18:57:33:

In Reply to: Re: Logical Reasoning at Work (text) posted by Isildur on December 7, 2000 at 18:23:55:

> I'm sure the reason for this is that if you can barely use you're weapon, you'll be so busy tring not to hurt yourself and focusing on trying to use the weapon, that you won't be able to learn other skills so easily, whereas if you are good at the weapon, you can focus more on your other skills.

> There are other examples. Attacking creatures with a weapon whose attack type has no effect, for example.

nobody trained me in using a sword yet if I pick one up (crappy or no) Im sure I would get better at it over time if I chose to whack something with it.

The effect thing is just silly.
Not being able to improve and flurry while thirsting is another.

I dont see any logic in either.
Im struggling to think of any logical practicing restrictions..........nope cant think of any.

I mean thats just what cf needs - is a bunch of trigger run characters standing at the gibberlings, the wraiths or wherever. Boooooo! to practicing.

Follow Ups:

Sure you might be able to use a sword, but you'd have to concentrate much more than if you'd been doing it as a profession. Just like if I pick up a gun I know how to use it, but that doesn't make me a sniper. nt Death_Claw 13:33:07 12/8/2000 (0)
on practicing Nepenthe(IMM) 00:54:11 12/8/2000 (13)
- reply Graham 01:07:47 12/8/2000 (12)
  - in addition... Graham 07:05:54 12/8/2000 (3)
    - assassin kicks Nepenthe(IMM) 14:33:39 12/8/2000 (0)
    - I often have thought that the threshold for invokers should be 91% myself (NT) Bah 07:54:43 12/8/2000 (1)
      - That is a very good idea, that's the main reason why I don't play invokers, just too much time sitting around perfecting spells, sometimes logic doesn't necessarily make the game more fun. nt Death_Claw 13:42:03 12/8/2000 (0)
  - Furthermore... The Arcane(VIP) 06:45:56 12/8/2000 (7)
    - I've wondered about this now and then as well Nepenthe(IMM) 13:07:07 12/8/2000 (4)
      - Hmm.... The Arcane(VIP) 16:01:20 12/8/2000 (0)
      - Re: I've wondered about this now and then as well Death_Claw the Personal witness, Experienced in using Random Number Generators. 13:39:33 12/8/2000 (2)
        
        On spells, saves etc, and the unholy RNG Drinks with Evil. 15:12:13 12/8/2000 (0)
        
        You either misread what I said or you didn't read it Nepenthe(IMM) 15:10:38 12/8/2000 (0)
    - With 100% in a spell you can still fail, but its rare n/t Stoneybalogna 10:55:48 12/8/2000 (1)
      - The check for % must be 0-100, not 1-100? House wins! (n/t) Drinks with Evil. 17:01:23 12/8/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > <i> I'm sure the reason for this is that if you can barely use you're weapon, you'll be so busy tring not to hurt yourself and focusing on trying to use the weapon, that you won't be able to learn other skills so easily, whereas if you are good at the weapon, you can focus more on your other skills.</i> > > There are other examples. Attacking creatures with a weapon whose attack type has no effect, for example. > > nobody trained me in using a sword yet if I pick one up (crappy or no) Im sure I would get better at it over time if I chose to whack something with it. > The effect thing is just silly. > Not being able to improve and flurry while thirsting is another. > I dont see any logic in either. > Im struggling to think of any logical practicing restrictions..........nope cant think of any. > I mean thats just what cf needs - is a bunch of trigger run characters standing at the gibberlings, the wraiths or wherever. Boooooo! to practicing.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]