> > Without typing everything again, I think what you're suggesting is more expensive (catering to individual problems) based on schools' experiences dealing with "special needs" children. <br> <br>Basically the reason why I'd have to know what your reasons are is that what you're asserting is pretty absurd and illogical. If you're fixing "problems" everywhere, in essence you're fixing problems that don't exist in a large number of places. To not even get into whether or not that in and of itself is detrimental to society as a whole, it flies in the face of logic to assume that is cost effective. Were you to claim it on moral or ethical grounds, I'd disagree with you but I'd understand your perspective, but from a financial and mathematical standpoint its simply absurd.