Recap. I started this argument out questioning his stance that the 2nd amendment was written not for the general public, but for the national guard. I provided a sarcastic paraphrase. I questioned him why the newly formed government never did anything to stop the sales of Remington rifles. You chimed in that it was not that simple and there was debate about it. I said they're stance was cognitive dissonance and created a mock amendment to make fun of what sort of sentance structure it would take to recreate his stance. You then claimed that I only throw baseless insults around and went on about some touchy feely schpeal that they have the right to their beliefs(agree but that doesn't make them right), then you implied I was beligerent. I responded that touchy feely, everyone is right schtick doesn't do it for me and then went on to clarify my Remington question. Then I made a joke about pro-gun people being cowards in the eyes of Colossus. Then you got really insulted and claimed once again I only make baseless insults, ignored my Remington firearms thing (because you have no convictions on the subject and were only being melodramatic internet police in the first place) then went on to make hypocritical statements (just as dismissive and devoid of empathy as you were accusing me of being)
Soooo... I can only say. No! Bad wrathpuppet! Don't be melodramatic internet police. Stop whining!
If you haven't noticed, the federal government has lied to us time and time again and if you pay close attention you can even spot them taking away liberties. I'll leave that routine out of it though, I like a lot of mouth frothery with my head in the sand debate.