Your feedback will be worth nothing.

May 30, 2010 10:58AM
Because it will be only one mage. I remember Grobbak (IMM) who rolled some mage, found his sleeks and said "Ah I found my sleeks, there is no problem with sleeks!". It was kinda funny to read how IMM judges huge part of the system based on one char who simply got lucky. As I posted on CF Facebook page, this system offers no balance at all. With my defense/offense shifter and transmuter I got my ambers in non cursed, easy to reach place, no fight needed. Just walk and get it. Then someone rolls an invoker and gets his amber in area explore or past some mobs, who are tough even for hero. Thats bullshit.

>Newbies can have fun exploring for their wands because they haven't been through all the areas a kajillion times.
Back in a day I was a newbie I remember 3 mage chars.
With first one I did not even know about sleeks or abs at all (I came from the mud with almost non-existant prep system). I was steamrolled by anyone and everyone. It could be fun for you, but it certainly was not fun for me.

My third mage (after couple years, when I made a comeback). I heard about sleeks, but noone in my cabal helped me with them. In fact they started to avoid me because 'asking to help with sleek locations is poor ar-pee'. I did not know where to look ever, and I was really frustrated. I wish you good luck exploring most of sleek holding areas with invoker. Or with AP. Especially given the fact, that despite Nep's words "look in magey place", many many locations are in not 'magey' places. Priests, churches etc. Torak named one btw.

Really, roll an invoker and try to find your amber in area explores on 40th rank. Especially if that will be evil invoker (meaning, no pocket healer/paladin/two warriors/transmuter/bard group dying from boredom in the fortress and happy to help you), you will have tons of fun. But not me.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/30/2010 11:00AM by dervish.
Subject Author Posted

Sleeks

briartangle May 30, 2010 08:58AM

Re: Sleeks

Isildur(VIP) May 30, 2010 11:06AM

Re: Sleeks

dervish May 30, 2010 11:08AM

Re: Sleeks

Isildur(VIP) May 30, 2010 01:56PM

I disagree.

trewyn May 30, 2010 10:24PM

Re: Sleeks

briartangle May 30, 2010 11:16AM

There's nothing wrong with it. It's not the wand system that's broken.

trewyn May 30, 2010 10:12AM

I don't agree with all you say, but generally a real good post here. To me the more complex rock paper scissors game is what its all about. (n/t)

kravidian May 30, 2010 10:38AM

Yeah, the shifter comment was meant as hyperbole. nt

trewyn May 30, 2010 11:22AM

Another point - progging gear

torak May 30, 2010 10:17AM

I was using prayer beads 11 years ago. (n/t)

Zruulg May 31, 2010 04:38AM

Tell you what.

Matrik May 30, 2010 10:10AM

The sleek system blows. It's russian roulette, which isn't fun for anyone. Except maybe Christopher Walken. NT

Sam May 30, 2010 05:43PM

Your feedback will be worth nothing.

dervish May 30, 2010 10:58AM

True

Matrik May 30, 2010 11:18AM

I'm on the same page experience wise~

enyuu May 30, 2010 10:35AM

Well given the fact....

torak May 30, 2010 09:34AM

More info please

PaulO May 30, 2010 06:40PM

Are you ESL?

trewyn May 30, 2010 10:28PM

Nope, I change my mind a lot and don't proofread enough

PaulO May 31, 2010 07:18AM

I'm not trying to piss you off per se...

Sam May 30, 2010 05:43PM

For your benefit

torak May 30, 2010 10:58PM

Shit, Rupen must have a sick damroll then (PS your protection didn't do shit, but you know that already...and I stand by my stoneskin comment). In closing, I liked this char except you were easy to spot.

Sam May 31, 2010 02:06AM

Well said. (n/t)

lightmage May 30, 2010 11:57AM

Suppose I shoulda read this one first.

trewyn May 30, 2010 10:31AM

Fair enough, but FWIW (semi-tangent)

briartangle May 30, 2010 09:52AM

And for the record, I'm not wasting one single edge point on a freaking attunement edge. There's other junk I'd rather take nt

trewyn May 30, 2010 10:45AM

No edge is worth even remotely as much as a soloable barrier spot.~

ibuki May 30, 2010 12:08PM

And I know of six that I don't have to have an edge to get that are there for EVERY mage nt

trewyn May 30, 2010 12:34PM

And you're spending a lot of points for a 5% chance of that (n/t)

torak May 30, 2010 12:16PM

Re: Deathblow

wrathpuppet May 30, 2010 10:04AM

Re: Deathblow

briartangle May 30, 2010 10:13AM

Re: Deathblow

torak May 30, 2010 10:07AM

Solution: Don't beat this dead horse anymore and leave the game.

Scrimbul May 30, 2010 10:10AM

Attunement edges...

torak May 30, 2010 10:01AM

Just because something can be countered/worked around/re-RNG'd doesn't make it balanced.

Scrimbul May 30, 2010 09:58AM

Meh

briartangle May 30, 2010 10:06AM

Out of every mage I knew in game

torak May 30, 2010 10:12AM

You had an extremely clear sense of damage considering you were desensitized...

agraemas May 30, 2010 09:43AM

Desensitize isn't what you're thinking of

torak May 30, 2010 09:44AM

It does what he's thinking.

trewyn May 30, 2010 10:39AM

So when the helpfile says physical damage?

agraemas May 30, 2010 09:49AM

*shrug*

torak May 30, 2010 09:53AM

Re: Sleeks

sleepy May 30, 2010 09:15AM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 124
Record Number of Users: 2 April 29, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 258 May 03, 2024