Re: He didn't get wanted by choice. Everything you say is wrong.

January 06, 2013 08:39PM
"He attacked and killed an evil. He did the right thing." -- With full knowledge it comes at the risk of endangering well-meaning guards who would stop him now or later.

"Someone else decided to flag him according to their own personal system of laws, and the paladin neither controls nor decides when that happens" -- Is he so thoughtless he cannot have foreseen this outcome as a possibility?

" He did what he needs to do." -- If what he needs to do is kill evil, at any cost, including killing a well-meaning guard who would seek to bring him to legal justice.

"If others then do things, then they do things, but it's not his fault, any more than it is his fault that the guard (who as Isildur pointed out you are entirely ignoring and considering as an ooc mob not as a sentient being) decided to attack him." -- Really? He's not the cause of it? I'm completely certain that if he did not break the law he would not have been warranted and it would not have happened. Is it not his responsibility as a paladin to think ahead for the sake of others?

" Frankly, why shouldn't the *guard* be dying for attacking a good aligned person?? It's the guard's fault, twice!" -- Because it could have been avoided, but apparently it wasn't worth preventing.

"Can the paladin feel bad about it? Obviously. Should he try to avoid killing goods? Naturally. Is it his fault when goods attack him and die due to no fault of his own? Nope." -- I don't see how you can buy that. That is like if I went vigilante, killed a rapist, then the police sought to bring me to justice, assaulted me, and were shot and killed. That's not my fault even though I know there's a chance I get caught and that might happen?
Subject Author Posted

I'm banned from posting a legit roleplay question for you all.

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 12:18PM

i agree. namely, paladins and fortress should be held to a higher standard than other goodies. fort pallies doubly so. nt

The Forsaken(VIP) January 07, 2013 05:53AM

I've always thought good cityguards were a dumb idea in the first place.

vortexmagus January 06, 2013 03:20PM

+19. (n/t)

The Faithful of Nazmorghul January 07, 2013 03:12AM

Good post, I agree.

WarEagle January 06, 2013 04:31PM

Re: I've always thought good cityguards were a dumb idea in the first place.

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 03:31PM

Re: I've always thought good cityguards were a dumb idea in the first place.

Isildur(VIP) January 06, 2013 09:02PM

Re: I've always thought good cityguards were a dumb idea in the first place.

WarEagle January 06, 2013 04:35PM

Re: I've always thought good cityguards were a dumb idea in the first place.

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 04:45PM

Yes.

langston January 07, 2013 08:28AM

No, goodies do not kill goodies period.

WarEagle January 06, 2013 05:30PM

Unless you're a rager. Or an outlander. Or a trib. Or get attacked by another goodie who wants you dead? (n/t)

vortexmagus January 07, 2013 01:03AM

actually...txt

Isildur(VIP) January 07, 2013 04:28AM

This is rather silly

langston January 07, 2013 08:35AM

Re: This is rather silly

Isildur(VIP) January 07, 2013 10:55AM

If they feel conflicted. It should be even moreso for a Maran BY A LOT.

crafteddeception January 07, 2013 11:00AM

But we are not talking about those characters.

vortexmagus January 07, 2013 05:48AM

It's your responibility to not kill them. Simple. Thought in your travels.

crafteddeception January 07, 2013 05:51AM

I don't see it that way, nor does most of the MUD. If it were like that, goodie ragers, outlanders, and tribunal would not exist~ (n/t)

vortexmagus January 07, 2013 05:52AM

Petition with the immortals. It's how it is.

crafteddeception January 07, 2013 05:56AM

Which edge? I can only think of the invoker ones. (n/t)

wrathpuppet January 07, 2013 05:59AM

Re: No, goodies do not kill goodies period.

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 05:41PM

He didn't get wanted by choice. Everything you say is wrong.

alansmithee January 06, 2013 06:29PM

those cityguards, always attacking good-aligned folk. such poor role-play on their part. they should have their align changed to neutral. nt

Isildur(VIP) January 07, 2013 04:30AM

I suggested that literally more than a decade ago. (n/t)

alansmithee January 08, 2013 01:14PM

This man is a retard Y'all don't listen to him. A 3 year old could pick this apart. (n/t)

Pro January 07, 2013 02:21AM

Which puts it out of your reach then. Sad for you. (n/t)

alansmithee January 07, 2013 06:48AM

Re: He didn't get wanted by choice. Everything you say is wrong.

RobDarken January 06, 2013 08:39PM

That's just silly.

vortexmagus January 07, 2013 01:16AM

No.

alansmithee January 06, 2013 08:59PM

Whose responsability is to never kill one of the light?

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 09:30PM

no history hasn't. txt

Isildur(VIP) January 07, 2013 04:42AM

I have uninducted people for their reaction after killing a goodie mob.

Java January 07, 2013 04:55AM

And you shouldn't have been instantly removed as leader of Nexus every time you killed someone who was on the weak side of Balance?

Scrimbul January 06, 2013 05:49PM

Re: And you shouldn't have been instantly removed as leader of Nexus every time you killed someone who was on the weak side of Balance?

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 06:14PM

I'm wondering what happened? Did he run up and flamestrike the goodie or did he try run away? (n/t)

tesline January 07, 2013 03:03AM

Re: I've always thought good cityguards were a dumb idea in the first place.

RobDarken January 06, 2013 03:23PM

Re: I'm banned from posting a legit roleplay question for you all.

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 03:06PM

The code

NbM(VIP) January 06, 2013 03:10PM

3 (n/t)

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 03:42PM

And 9.

istirith January 06, 2013 05:41PM

Respect != Obey. If they wanted people to be bound by tribunal law, they would say so, and also not let paladins be neutral instead of lawful. (n/t)

alansmithee January 06, 2013 09:05PM

there is no more "lawful"; only "orderly". nt

Isildur(VIP) January 07, 2013 04:26AM

yeah, I know, my point is they are not required to be orderly anymore, they can be neutral. tribunal law is not required to be obeyed. (n/t)

alansmithee January 07, 2013 06:49AM

And there is no more good, only PKW (n/t)

NbM(VIP) January 07, 2013 05:00AM

Semi-accidentally killing a few cityguards while WANTED isn't worth unempowerment.

DurNominator(VIP) January 06, 2013 02:32PM

Eh. I disagree. They should consider that before being wanted. (n/t)

Borkahd January 06, 2013 03:30PM

Shouldn't you unempower the paladin for getting a wanted flag then?

DurNominator(VIP) January 07, 2013 03:23AM

If it is a habitual issue, stick it in their ass. =) (n/t)

Borkahd January 07, 2013 03:56AM

Agreed.

DurNominator(VIP) January 08, 2013 09:39PM

To add...

Borkahd January 07, 2013 04:06AM

Seconded

NbM(VIP) January 07, 2013 05:02AM

This is always the solution I offer to problems had by people with children. NT

Batman January 07, 2013 04:01AM

I always did with my goodies. Well, except Ghrim. Only goodie guards I never tried to kill with Ghrim were dwarves :)

Sam January 06, 2013 04:20PM

Re: Semi-accidentally killing a few cityguards while WANTED isn't worth unempowerment.

crafteddeception January 06, 2013 02:59PM

Considering your excessively strict interpretation of Nexus balance solely to full sac people with your permas you really shouldn't be posting about Fort.

Scrimbul January 06, 2013 01:53PM

It's also a bias towards limited selection of targets.

Bendak January 06, 2013 12:33PM



Sorry, you do not have permission to post/reply in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 127
Record Number of Users: 1 April 26, 2024
Record Number of Guests: 161 April 28, 2024