>implying lobbying isn't successful via minority or civil liberty related parties
>implying only corporations get bonuses from lobbying or that because they are rich it immediately proves successful

>implying we are, or have ever been, a pure capitalist society
>implying republicans are that different from democrats and that they want everything privatized

>implying the republican base is any less informed than the democratic one
**SUBSECTION TO AFOREMENTIONED IMPLICATION**
> implying people who agree with you are more educated than those who disagree with you (CONTRAST/ASSIMILATION EFFECT, RESISTANCE IS FUTILE)



"Well, again, until you've been utterly fucked over by these industries, you know nothing."

>IMPLYING EXPERIENCE IS NECESSARY FOR EMPATHY, UNDERSTANDING, EVALUATION, OR CRITICISM

>implying studies show the Fox News base is a bunch of idiots (I don't even like Fox News but this is beyond an assumptive statement)

>implying americans, per studies, have an extreme value towards capitalism as a way of life. The only ultimate-value studies showed all Americans relate to is egalitarianism.

>implying the free market doesn't have benefits
>implying socialistic (not socialist, nor is this an insult) policies don't have drawbacks
>implying you preferring one over the other makes one better than the other

>implying corporations run the GOP
>implying corporations do not run the Democratic Party (feel free to look at campaign donations/support listings/lobbying funds going to the republican vs democratic parties. You'll be surprised: [www.opensecrets.org] , [www.opensecrets.org] , [www.opensecrets.org] , [www.opensecrets.org] , [www.opensecrets.org] , etc. Good stuff)


>IMPLYING CONSISTENT ARGUMENTS OF "UNTIL YOU GET FUCKED YOU DON'T KNOW" MEAN ANYTHING AT ALL

>implying that is capitalism (see Das Kapital - fuck socialism, let's do some Marxism bra)

>implying your anger means you make sense


>implying



>IMPLYING



>IMPLYING