Fact is, this decision was a bad decision in an arguably good cause.
I support certain parts of ACA - universal health care insurance is a good thing, but not universal health care. That's a key distinction that Rade made.
What you guys haven't touched base on are the future ramifications of this decision, WHICH IS THE MAIN POINT OF THE RULING. ACA is only the underlying subject from which the decision came about.
In effect, the government has been given a green pass to REGULATE WHAT PEOPLE DON'T DO. This expanded the government's power exponentially. Instead of passing laws on restrictions of what people can't do, the government can pass penalties if US citizens don't do something.
People without insurance being penalized for not having insurance?
Think about it.
[
www.law.cornell.edu]