Re: I think it natural no one -wants- to be censored. But the silent majority understand its necessity.

January 03, 2008 09:59AM
I just don't see the need. Dios has been in operation for a very long time without it, why is now a necessity?

As for the silent majority, I just assumed their posts where being deleted so as to look like it was only a small minority of "nut jobs" that disliked this idea. :p

That said silence is not a sign of acceptance for one opinion over another.
Subject Author Posted

Editing of posts by VIPs.

Death_Claw January 02, 2008 11:45AM

Cosign. NT

Batman January 03, 2008 02:06PM

As far as I'm aware, no one has ever claimed it has happened

daurwyn(VIP) January 03, 2008 07:37AM

I noticed it on Pro's thread below.

Death_Claw January 03, 2008 08:39AM

Hmm, you aren't thinking of my editing are you?

daurwyn January 07, 2008 02:53PM

And as soon as we mangle anyone's context, that'd be a very viable complaint. But we don't intend to. nt

Yhorian January 03, 2008 09:20AM

Fine but don't say I didn't warn you or complain about it later on when your good intentions backfire. n/t

Death_Claw January 03, 2008 09:23AM

I agree with Death_Claw

adam_gay January 02, 2008 05:00PM

Let's say that there's a big discussion following started by the thread.

DurNominator(VIP) January 03, 2008 03:00AM

Re: Let's say that there's a big discussion following started by the thread.

adam_gay January 03, 2008 04:05AM

What about logs as an alternative example?

Yhorian(VIP) January 03, 2008 05:30AM

Re: What about logs as an alternative example?

adam_gay January 03, 2008 07:10AM

How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?

Yhorian(VIP) January 03, 2008 07:46AM

Re: How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?

infi January 03, 2008 11:14AM

Misinfo. nt

Yhorian January 04, 2008 01:27AM

Re: How about you wait until we do edit someones ideas/views/experiences, then protest?

adam_gay January 03, 2008 09:47AM

I think it natural no one -wants- to be censored. But the silent majority understand its necessity.

Yhorian January 03, 2008 09:51AM

Re: I think it natural no one -wants- to be censored. But the silent majority understand its necessity.

adam_gay January 03, 2008 09:59AM

It's not a necessity, but it's a damn handy tool.

Yhorian January 03, 2008 10:06AM

Re: It's not a necessity, but it's a damn handy tool.

adam_gay January 03, 2008 11:50AM

Seconded and fwiw

Rogue January 02, 2008 05:32PM

Way to oversimplify

daurwyn(VIP) January 03, 2008 07:39AM

Re: Way to oversimplify

adam_gay January 03, 2008 09:54AM

I'd far prefer editing out the bad stuff from good posts. Ie, quest info from a pretty good rant on quests. nt

Yhorian(VIP) January 02, 2008 04:03PM

For what it's worth

DurNominator(VIP) January 02, 2008 12:16PM

You're missing the point, us regular folk won't know you guys changed our posts. War is Peace and Freedom is Slavery.~

happyorb January 02, 2008 12:56PM

Are you sure it doesn't say that it was edited by someone? nt

The Forsaken(VIP) January 02, 2008 01:06PM

On the pro post below "I know and I wish"

Derexal January 02, 2008 02:09PM

If I had deleted the entire post, you'd all just throw a hissy fit on over-censoring.

Yhorian(VIP) January 02, 2008 04:32PM

There's no need to get defensive.

Death_Claw January 03, 2008 08:43AM

My censored version on what it read before

DurNominator(VIP) January 02, 2008 02:25PM

Personally I am in favor for nuking the post.

Derexal January 02, 2008 02:28PM

Yeah, I agree with Dexiekins.

vladamir January 04, 2008 08:59AM

Re: For what it's worth

Splntrd January 02, 2008 12:53PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 31
Record Number of Users: 59 October 25, 2015
Record Number of Guests: 341 February 12, 2018